🔗 Share this article

Just two days prior to the New York race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange issued a bold electoral prediction – not just who would win citywide, but precinct by precinct. Lange, a political analyst born and raised in the city, devoted over a decade in progressive politics and has become something of a local celebrity recently for his deep dives into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He published his highly detailed forecast map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani would win while failed to predict the independent candidate’s solid showing – on his Substack, the Narrative War. He has a flair for clever terms. He pointed out, as an example, the divide between the progressive stronghold, stretching from Park Slope to Bushwick to a third locale, where he predicted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would win by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal surpass the mainstream paper” in audience and most voters favored Cuomo, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Trends and Unexpected Results

How was your election night?

It was necessary because they were dropping around 200,000 votes into the system frequently! I felt a little nervous at the beginning: The candidate was ahead the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but there were two big batches of votes that came in later and the advantage dropped from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

You know, it was possible where election day went kind of poorly for Mamdani, in which the opponent would have essentially doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. However Mamdani gained half a million votes to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He went out and massively expanded his support from the primary.

Coalition Building

How did Mamdani get additional support from?

He assembled the alliance that the left always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, it’s young, tenants and individuals squeezed by affordability. He gained considerably with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the earlier election. Plus he boosted his base of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He built the alliance that progressives long aimed for: diverse, young, renters and people squeezed by affordability

There were also a number of supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It is a genuine phenomenon, limited to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Voters in ethnic enclaves that supported the former president previously went for the progressive now. However I wouldn’t say he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Impact

A major development of the night was the record participation. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Turnout was significantly higher than anticipated. I thought it could exceed two million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – that is a huge number of participants. Existed a substantial anti-Mamdani block, energized, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that sufficed to win.

You predicted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Currently you would say he’s favored to surpass half. He has just over 50% but remain around 200,000 votes uncounted at that time. Thus I don’t think it’s definitive, but I believe it’s likely, and I wish he does so then none can claim the Republican was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His vote plummeted.

He lost a single precinct in any borough. Including one neighborhood in Staten Island, which is like an highly conservative neighborhood. That really was unexpected. Cuomo held Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and plus gained all of these Republicans on Staten Island with a strong turnout. I believe occurred a lot of strategic balloting by the Republicans. This happened before Trump endorsed for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide unless Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your much mentioned left-wing base – was support for the candidate dominant in those parts of the boroughs?

I think there was some weakening of the commie corridor in some areas like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. There, for example, the property owners and homeowners all went for the independent. So there existed a little resistance. But overall, mostly the leftist base is a key factor why Mamdani won – he was polling between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the election there was coverage on if the candidate was making inroads with the community. Any indication that he succeeded?

There are neighborhoods with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as specific locales – where he performed strongly. But in the affluent districts like the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance definitely mattered there. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored the independent. And also, there are newcomers from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, they were pretty staunchly Cuomo. So I don’t know if there were major surprises here, but Mamdani retained left-leaning areas and including sections of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what the city means politically? Will the progressive base become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest figures from progressives come from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that we’ll see additional examples – candidates will emerge from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

However I believe that each urban center in the US could develop their own commie corridor. Cities are the epicenters of leftwing power in the nation – since they’re young, people rent and they represent locales where people are crushed by the inequalities exist.